Wallace McKenzie
-
The Basics
-
Wallace on Patch
-
More Stuff
Comments
-
On the article Future of Reedy Meadow Golf Course Emerging as Town Issue
-
On the article Selectman Candidates Discuss MarketStreet With Residents
Wallace McKenzie
8:01 pm on Tuesday, April 9, 2013
ReplyJohn, only having Exit 43 on their site is a condition that the Wakefield Board of Appeals set in order for their to be a small sign at exit 42 advertising MarketStreet, In addition ND is supposed to write into all the leases that no tenant will advertise exit 42. And on a yearly basis they have to remind the tenants not to advertise exit 42. Not sure if ND has accepted all the conditions yet to receive permission for the sign.
-
On the article Selectman Candidates Discuss MarketStreet With Residents
Wallace McKenzie
9:43 pm on Friday, April 5, 2013
Anne,
Very good summary of the meeting. People believe that the agreement should be honored. -
On the article Here's a Look at Tonight's Lynnfield Town Meeting Warrant
Wallace McKenzie
5:44 pm on Wednesday, March 27, 2013
ReplyGlad to see that National Development did not file an article at the last minute. I hope they Honor their Agreement with the Town from 2007 and do not file an article for a multiplex in October for the fall town meeting.
-
On the article LETTER: Stand By Original Agreement on MarketStreet Theater
Wallace McKenzie
6:37 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013
ReplyJoe, You correctly state the feelings for many of the 81% who voted for the agreement.
-
On the article LETTER: 59 Lynnfield Residents Urge 'No' Vote on Cinema
Wallace McKenzie
11:09 am on Sunday, March 17, 2013
ReplyIt was mentioned at a couple of meetings in 2006 and 2007, but the traffic engineers said it was not fully studied and they did not believe it was feasible.
-
On the article LETTER: 59 Lynnfield Residents Urge 'No' Vote on Cinema
Wallace McKenzie
8:25 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Linda,
It is important to remember that we are first and foremost asking National Development to Honor the Agreement that they and approximately 1/3 of the town voters agreed to in 2007 that there would not be a cinema and that the maximum square feet is 395,000 sq ft.Voting No on the cinema is an affirmation of that Agreement.
Over the past six years, when we have approached the Board of Selectmen, Planning Board and other governmental bodies, we have been asked "Is it in writing", if it isn't they can't help you. The agreement is in writing and says no cinema and 395,000 sq st. Let's Preserve Lynnfield.
-
On the article LETTER: 59 Lynnfield Residents Urge 'No' Vote on Cinema
Wallace McKenzie
8:24 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Hi,
It is important to remember that we are first and foremost asking National Development to Honor the Agreement that they and approximately 1/3 of the town voters agreed to in 2007 that there would not be a cinema and that the maximum square feet is 395,000 sq ft.Voting No on the cinema is an affirmation of that Agreement.
Over the past six years, when we have approached the Board of Selectmen, Planning Board and other governmental bodies, we have been asked "Is it in writing", if it isn't they can't help you. The agreement is in writing and says no cinema and 395,000 sq st. Let's Preserve Lynnfield.
-
On the article LETTER: 59 Lynnfield Residents Urge 'No' Vote on Cinema
Wallace McKenzie
8:23 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Please send you name, address and email to info@topics01940.org and we will add you to our email list. Please follow the issue and others at www.topics01940.org
-
On the article LETTER: 59 Lynnfield Residents Urge 'No' Vote on Cinema
Wallace McKenzie
8:09 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Please send you name, address and email to info@topics01940.org and we will add you to our email list. Please follow the issue and others at www.topics01940.org
Wallace McKenzie
6:40 am on Thursday, May 2, 2013
When any analysis is done, it should include the 12 million in debt that the town issued for the course. When people say they pay for themselves the analysis should include all the costs.