Voters Approve Fingerprinting For Some Town Licenses

At this week's town meeting, warrant article 6 generated some scrutiny from town voters, but passed with a healthy margin.

Lynnfield town meeting voters have approved a bylaw that will require a fingerprint-based criminal background check for individuals seeking to acquire certain licenses in town.

At Monday night's town meeting, warrant article 6 drew perhaps the largest share of public discussion, with the other eight warrants passing in relatively short order. The article was submitted by Police Chief David Breen, who fielded a handful of questions from citizens about it before the vote.

For this particular warrant, Breen explained that the town already does criminal background checks on individuals who apply for various peddling and vending licenses, but that the added layer of scrutiny provided by fingerprinting will enable police to find active warrants or people who are using fake names. There is a one-time $100 fee for the fingerprinting.

Breen also said that Wakefield and Reading currently have similar laws on the books, Swampscott has recently approved one, and a number of other area municipalities are looking at the idea.

Town Counsel Tom Mullen addressed one citizen's concern about the by-law not applying to individual employees of a company or organization that takes out a permit. He acknowledged this as a problem, but added that the town by-law goes as far as state law allows it go in this area.

Of the citizens who expressed concern about the measure, one issue that came up was the possibility that business could become harder to conduct in Lynnfield. Others were concerned about privacy of individuals seeking something like a one-time liquor license for an event, or about whether the by-law was enforceable in the first place.

Breen explained that that new by-law would not apply to children or to nonprofits, or to those with existing licenses in town - only to those taking out town permits for business activities. The Lynnfield police chief noted that months back, some overly aggressive magazine salespeople appeared in town and conned a few seniors into buying subscriptions that never showed up. He noted that a number of other North Shore towns have had their own problems with shady or suspect vendors passing through town. Another scenario he cited was the possibility of a sex offender operating an ice cream truck.

The chief explained that vendors whose permit requests are denied because of something coming up in a background check will still have the right to appeal to the board of selectmen.

"This is only going to be applied when we want to evaluate whether individuals who want to do business in the community are fit to do so," added Town Administrator Bill Gustus.

Specifically, the by-law would apply to new applicants for the following town licenses:

Hawker and Peddler
Liquor Licensee
Manager or Alternate Manager of a Liquor Licensee
Solicitors and Canvassers
Dealers in Junk, Second-Hand Articles and Antiques
Second Hand Motor Vehicle Dealer
Hackney Carriage (Taxi) Operator
Ice Cream Truck Vendor

The full text of the town's warrant article can be viewed at this link.

Angry Dave October 17, 2012 at 01:36 PM
Yet you still do not need even a driver's license to vote. What a country!!!!
Terraformer October 17, 2012 at 03:35 PM
I am loving this statist approach to junk collection. I really see how someone can be so dangerous as to not be suitable to pick up my junk but yet safe enough to be out on the streets... Anyhow, I did some digging into this before the vote and apparently this is Beacon Hill providing both the licensing opportunity as well as the access to the CJIS to the towns. Hence making it a "build it and they will come" proposition and apparently we have come running. As someone pointed out during the town meeting, this list looks like the undesirables list of a snobbish community and is antithetical to freedom and civil liberty. Don't want salesman in your community, don't open the door. I don't want them, so I don't open the door. Lets face it, most people affected by this will not have existing records but now the FBI and the state will have their fingerprints on file. Although I don't believe Breen and the Town Selectman/administrator will abuse their discretionary authority in general, I believe very strongly that no citizen in a free society should, if they must be licensed at all, be subjected to a broad discretionary licensing system where they have no idea if they are suitable for the license. Everyone should be able to look at the criteria and be able to know without aid of a lawyer or shaman whether they are qualified for the license.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »