Both dropout of race.

If you don't know by now, don't vote. Nothing worse than being uninformed and then voting, that is what happened last time!!

Don't get it - two very different choices and clear. If you have not decided by now it probably says more about you than the candidates.

Actually there are four very different candidates. Do you not know who's going to be on your ballot? So much for being "informed".

Sean, the other two candidates do count. I am Voting for one of them and not for the two candidates that the media have chosen to highlight. I wonder if people are informed about what Gary Johnnson and Jill Stein represent?

My guess is no and I'd also guess that these two candidates are unknown to most voters. That's the troubling issue about these elections. They go on for too long and if you want any chance of winning one must accrue millions and millions of dollars.

The country is in a real fiscal mess and I don't have confidence in any of the two mainstream candidates. That's why tomorrow I'm voting with my head and being an informed voter it won't be Obama or Romney.

Undecided, here's Romney's record as Mass. governor to help you figure it out.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/01/mitt-romney-massachusetts-budget-_n_2051922.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

The only way to reduce abuse in programs like food stamps is to reduce funding. This is the only way to force the program administrators to go find the inefficiencies. It isn't because we don't care about feeding people that are in need. It's because there are people on food stamps that don't need them. People that take vacations, have nice cars, get their hair and nails done regularly and don't have a problem with other people paying for their food, rent, and health insurance. Drug dealers, prostitutes, and other people with unreportable income are living in tax funded affordable housing. Democrat approach: throw enough money at it to make sure the people that actually need the help get it. Republican approach: set reasonable budgets and ensure that the money is only going to the people that actually need it.

Harry Reid has said that if Romney is elected the democrats will not work with him.Maybe that explains the undecided voters. Americans get screwed by the same people that tell us they will work for us. We need to have one party or the other with the power to show us what they can do.

Take 3 Minutes to Learn More about Question 3 at:
http://mavotenoonquestion3.com/question-3-in-3-minutes/

Question 3 is a "Wolf in Sheep's Clothing" warn citizens in California and Colorado where pot stores have proliferated under a law similar to the one proposed here. The language in this 6-page law includes "other conditions" which allows virtually anyone to get a marijuana recommendation for any reason. There can be 35 pot stores in the first year, but there is no upper limit in the law. This is the LEAST RESTRICTIVE marijuana law in New England. With an undefined 60-day supply, amounting to hundreds of joints, allowed on a person or in a car, theft and diversion to black market sales are inevitable. Home grow sites are already subject to criminal break-ins in neighborhoods as close as Rhode Island. And even the Obama administration has called rising levels of youth use and addiction a legitimate public health issue. There has to be a better way to be compassionate.
Please get the details before you vote. To learn about Question 3 go to: www.MaVoteNoOnQuestion3.com

These voters aren't really "undecided." They are probably sophisticated enough to say "I'm still not sure" instead of "none of your @#%! business!!!!"

Wouldn't cutting funding to welfare, food stamps, etc. Hurt the people who really need it more? Typically, those who really need it are the people who can't get it or receive minimum benefits. The system is so screwed up that cutting funding would only hurt those familys more. Those who have no intention of working would most likely be affectd the least

I get that, the system is def. In need of reform. What I'm saying is if you are a homeowner, say father of 3, n you lost your job, you would be lucky to get a small ration of stamps. However if you don't work, don't own property, don't conrribute anything, then you get the whole package. I feel that just simply cutting funding, would just hurt those people who really deserve the help, because they are at the bottom of the barrel now.

Mr. Marini, No, I do not "see how stupid Tricia looks." Just how does someone "look" stupid anyway--especially on a blog? You and your grammatically-challenged post, on the other hand, certainly give the impression of someone who is lacking in the intelligence area. Are you serious? Stealing Tricia's question format but failing to formulate your own coherent questions only exposes your lack of education (and anger) issues. Great questions, Tricia, by the way! I think you captured the Republican Party's platform quite well!

If you are undecided stay home. You have had plenty of time to come to a decision. Also don't believe exit polls.....if you have paid attention they aren't asking anyone who has grey hair? Hmm wonder what that means.

Just pointing out how silly she looks and sounds, that's all. Much like you!