patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Town Meeting Next Big Step For Athletic Fields Project

Town's field committee held inaugural meeting Thursday evening. Two members still to be named. Further momentum to depend on town meeting result.

 

The town's new field committee held its inaugural meeting on Thursday night - although the next big step for the long-awaited athletic fields complex comes less than two weeks from now at town meeting.

On Thursday, Chairman Arthur Bourque provided an update on the project to representatives of the town's various athletic programs and others. Phil Crawford, vice chair of the town finance committee, and Kyle Shinnick, a former Lynnfield Rotary president who is a manager with the firm Land Pros, are the other two committee members at this point. Two additional committee members have yet to be named and Town Administrator William Gustus indicated after the meeting that the selectmen may take this matter up on April 30 when they meet right before town meeting. 

At this point, town meeting figures very prominently into the proposed athletic fields complex. That's because voters will be asked to approve article #24, which would use $100,000 from the town's Sale of Real Estate Fund for initial engineering and consulting work on the fields project. The fund currently contains about $950,000 and Bourque said that the $100,000 in question would be replenished when the town gets its expected $1 million in funds from the Market Street at Lynnfield project.

"There's no impact on taxpayers for the first million, there's no impact on the taxpayers for what we're trying to do currently," said Bourque, who recently wrapped up 12 years as a selectman and was elected town moderator. Bourque has long been active in the effort to bring a fields complex to town, and early in the meetng he noted that his former colleagues on the board of selectmen, Bob MacKendrick and Al Merritt, are also longtime supporters. Merritt is also the committee's liaison to the select board.

If voters do approve the warrant article, one of the next steps would be the selection of the planning, consulting and engineering firms by June 1. By October 1, planners hope to have the needs assessment, surveying and wetlands delineation work complete, and by the start of next February, the preliminary fields layout and project cost estimates would be ready.

While town meeting voters will have considerable say over the project's momentum at the end of the month, Bourque also noted that the Lynnfield Center Water District, which owns the land, plus the town conservation commission and state Department of Environmental Protection will also have matters to sign off on with the project.

Last weekend, committee members reportedly took a trip up to the land parcel, which sits off Main Street close to the Middleton border. One thing about the 98.5 acre site is that some of the older wetland delineations may no longer be completely accurate - which could at least conceivably provide a little more land to work with than expected. Later in the meeting, it was noted that the land in question was actually taken by eminent domain by the town back in the 1960s for a reservoir that was never built.

"I knew we had a lot of space... There was just more land than we could ever possibly imagine," said Bourque of the recent site visit. Along with fields for a variety of sports, planners also envision passive recreation facilities as well, such as a dog park, walking/biking trails and possibly a canoe/kayak launch.

"We're working to try to incorporate this so it is a multipurpose park so everyone in town can get excited about this," said Bourque.

Later, Town Administrator Bill Gustus pointed out that "a complex like this really adds to the quality of life in a community," noting that house hunters often check on a town's recreational offerings before deciding to move in.

Looking ahead, there are still numerous other questions to address as the project goes forward. For example, planners must determine who exactly will maintain the fields, although as public property, the DPW appears to be a likely candidate. It also remains to be seen whether running water will be available at the site. Bourque said it is unlikely that there will be a refreshment stand, and no formal decision has been made on lighting the fields.

The goal is to complete the project for April, 2015 - and between now and then, fundraising will be key. Crawford reported that he has already begun researching potential grants from the state and elsewhere - although, as he noted, "the first step is getting all the engineering done."

Editor's Note: For a previous story with more details about the proposed athletic fields complex, click here.

Related Topics: lynnfield athletic fields complex

Don

7:09 am on Friday, April 20, 2012

We can save $100K by reusing plans that have already been developed. At least other towns would be willing to share, maybe for a small fee or trade of services. I have seen $500K proposed for engineering the rail trails and now $100K for engineering a park. Both of these projects have existing plans for other similar efforts. This is how engineers save money, REUSE. But hey, reuse is green also :-). I wrote to our town manager on the rail trails and heard nothing. Surely the engineering firm who is probably going to reuse the plans and re-sell them to Lynnfield don't want anyone to know this. Well folks, if I can, I will recommend not voting for any of this till these town "managers" do some hard work and not just hand the project off to a subcontractor, paying for it with our money.

Reply

linda

11:13 am on Friday, April 20, 2012

WHY do you all refuse to acknowledge that this is a waste of tax payers money. AGAIN, we have sports fields. We have newer fields at the new middle school, we spent tax money on them and tax money for irrigation, and maintenance. Building a new sports "complex" will still require upkeep. It will be more beneficial for us taxpayers to spend OUR tax dollar on something more worthy like fixing roads and sidewalks or in more essential services. AGAIN, WHY ARE YOU SO EAGER TO RAISE OUR TAXES YET AGAIN, UNLESS YOU HAVE FRIENDS IN THE BUSINESS WHO WOULD BENEFIT FROM SUCH CONTRACTS!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don

11:59 am on Friday, April 20, 2012

That is usually the case Linda. My point is that all that engineering money can be applied to the actual building of the projects, because someone else already paid for similar engineering work. It is done, now just formulate the landscape and start building. That saves time too. Have to disagree with you, I think parks are great and we cannot have enough of them. I do respect your opinion and please vote as you like.

Citizen X

1:00 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012

Looking at the facilities of similar towns, Lynnfield's fields are not in great shape. This is a unique opportunity for the town to develop recreational space at a minimal cost to taxpayers. Of course, someone is going to get the contracts to develop the facilities. Like anything else, however, I would expect the contracts to be put out to an open bid. To suggest that people would only vote in favor of the development is because they have family or friend who would benefit, is short-sighted.

Reply

melissa sorrentino

10:15 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012

First - if it's going to be for EVERYONE please stop calling it Athletic Fields...as Don said parks are VERY attractive so call it an Athletic Park because when you say fields people automatically only think of particular sports and this doesn't appear to be the vision but it's not being presented to the general public well.

Second - this may be a dumb question but i'm wondering if there is going to be playgrounds with at least partial shade with structures for 2-5 years and 5-12 years. I'm hoping there will be a few areas in various locations since the space is large.

Third - could they be more specific about ideas for other passive recreational areas. I think any age group would appreciate horshoe pits, bocce court, shuffleboard and a picnic pavillion to encourage outdoor board games, etc. Also, be sure anyone interested in outdoor aerobics has space to do so. The senior center could relocate some of their activities to the park in nice weather.

I meet moms at the Ipswich River Park track to take my 4-year-old to ride her bike and we run or walk with them. It's a smooth surface so it's safe for them to ride.

Other sports - ice skating, racquetball, volleyball, badminton, etc.

I'm seeing some great ideas so far and I want to see more - I love the canoeing/kayaking idea. If this is for everyone and I think the vision is going in that direction - it should be presented in that way so everyone can see the benefit so it will happily move forward.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don

6:40 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

All awesome ideas Melissa. This is what the city does for folks in southern CA. Provide all that and more for their citizens. Our politicians could learn from that, but lets not pay for them to take any more junkets.

Leave a comment