Selectmen, Residents Divided on Proposed Cinema
In what could be a sign of things to come, even Lynnfield's two current selectmen have differing opinions on a proposed cinema in town.
The debate over a proposed cinema in Lynnfield could become an increasingly rancorous one, with even the town selectmen currently divided on the matter.
During a two-plus hour selectmen's meeting on Monday night, dozens of town residents came out to express some very strong concerns about the specialty cinema that National Development plans to ask town meeting voters to approve in April. Ted Tye of National Development had started off the meeting with an update on the project, including on the proposed cinema. More from Tye's update can be seen here.
National Development will ask voters at the April 29th town meeting to approve a zoning change allowing an 8-screen specialty cinema that would open with Phase 2 of MarketStreet Lynnfield in late 2014 or early 2015. During his presentation, Tye presented the cinema as an important long-term strategy for MarketStreet Lynnfield - one that would be consistent with the town's character and which would have a more upscale experience than larger theaters, complete with a bar and restaurant and a premium ticketing option. He estimated that the theater would provide about $200,000 in revenues for the town, between real estate and local meals taxes.
"We don't think the theater will add to any issues that will be created here," said Tye.
Residents who came to the microphone one by one were more concerned about traffic and disturbances at the proposed movie theater - and they also repeatedly argued that a cinema proposal had already been voted down in the past. Later, it was explained that proposed zoning changes are allowed under law to come up every two years when they do not pass.
Lynnfield residents Wally McKenzie and Joe DeMaina both spoke at the meeting about their respective concerns. Last week, the two spoke with Lynnfield Patch about the cinema plan, maintaining that they want National Development to stick with its existing (non-cinema) agreement on MarketStreet.
When it came to the two current members of the Lynnfield Board of Selectmen, not even they were on the same page. The third seat has been vacant since the beginning of the year when Al Merritt resigned to focus on a health condition.
Before it was over, Selectman Bob MacKendrick reported that he does not support the project - but he also emphasized that he will support whatever voters decide at town meeting.
"It is divisive to the town," said MacKendrick. "And I don't like things that divide the town and pit neighbors against neighbors." He noted that historically, Lynnfield has been able to reach consensus on difficult town issues. "I feel from my standpoint, I'm against it," said MacKendrick to applause from the audience.
Selectman Dave Nelson indicated that he supports the proposed cinema, maintaining that the town needs the revenues it will bring. "I've always supported MarketStreet, but things change. As you progress, you see things that need to happen," said Nelson. "I think the cinema is a good idea, a good step for MarketStreet." Still, Nelson also made it clear that ultimately, this is still very much a matter for the town's voters to decide.
"Go to town meeting and vote and let's get this thing done and over with," said Nelson.
With no consensus on the current board and with two contested selectmen seats in the April 8th town election, it will be appropriate for the new board to make a recommendation on the warrant article, said MacKendrick.
Looking ahead, any and all warrant articles must be filed by March 25th, and all that one requires is 10 citizen signatures. One Fernway resident raised concern about the article "sneaking into town meeting" with no time for review by residents or officials. Town Administrator Bill Gustus replied that "we would hope to get it earlier," but also made it clear that the procedures for getting an article onto the town warrant are already very specific and longstanding.
"Once again, we're asked to basically pick sides," Fernway resident Frank Riccardi told the meeting. DeMaina expressed similar sentiments elsewhere in the meeting, saying he is "distressed by the ripping of the social fabric of the town."
After the meeting, Tye told Lynnfield Patch that hearing from the neighbors was "what this meeting is about." He said he was aware of their concerns and that he had expected to them to turn out to express them. However, he also maintained that there are numerous people in Lynnfield who do support building the cinema. "I listened, I learned a lot, I try to be very respectful of what I hear," said Tye.
For more coverage of the MarketStreet Lynnfield project, click here. More news and some video from the Selectmen's meeting will be posted within the next day as well.
Joe DeMaina
8:20 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The carrot being waving in front of the town is additional revenues from meals taxes at MS restaurants. But as Mr Boone rightly noted it's a false promise. Area restaurants are already so chock full on weekend nights it's hard to get in.There would be minimal increased revenue but of course this won't be documented until after ND had got their way (again).
Also,this 1,000 seat multiplex would turn over at least three times a night adding 3,000 people and their cars to the already traffic saturated roads of town in all directions. As the target market for most movies is teenagers and young adults that is who most of those 3,000 people will be. Not the target market of an upscale mall and mostly not the young from the town itself.
Craig Foster
9:18 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
We have so few restaurants in Lynnfield that the town sees very little benefit from Restaurants being full. Lynnfield needs things like great restaurants and yes a specialty cinema if it wants to continue to see property values rise and people wanting to move into the town.
Joe DeMaina
9:47 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Craig-- I think you are mis-understanding the comment. The restaurants at MS will be full as are all the restaurants in area towns regardless of a movie or not. The additional revenues are an illusion because you cannot get more meals tax from a restaurant that is already full.
The greater problem will be the decline in town property values. There are many homes near the mall that will decline in value as they look into the mall. A view that we were told would be shielded but has not happened.An example, there are million dollar homes on Thistle Lane that now look down into a mall. Their value has been compromised. (2 of the 5 are now for sale, one with a price reduced sign on it ). As property values near the mall decline then property values across the entire town decline due to real estate comparative values (aka Comps). However the town still needs the same I believe 33 million to run the town. As a result lower property values spawn higher property taxes. Please notice that newspapers are reporting that home sales and home values are on the rise across Massachusetts. Yet Lynnfield had an increase of home sales in 2012 of 15% but the home values declined by 5.6%. A harbinger of things to come ?
And finally calling it a specialty theatre because it has a few premuim seats is like calling an airplane a specialty airliner because it has a first class compartment.
Debbie
8:29 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I was there last night and heard one Fernway resident say: " I and many of my neighbors are ready to put our house on the market" . Isn't it sad, that they feel they are being driven out of their beloved homes????? For what???? A movie theater, when there are so many near by....AND really Pottery Barn, and William Somona...let's see...should I go 6 miles to Peabody, or 7 to Burlington....Do I really need one in Lynnfield. Same with Five Guys,and The Paper Store!! AND this Ted Tye was so PROUD to annouce....Give us something that's not in Burlington, or Peabody.....This is same old, same old already.
Craig Foster
9:10 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Debbie that person does not speak for all of Fernway's residents. Actually probably speaks for very few of them. As a resident who lives on Fernway I very much support the Cinema and hope it passes.
My bet is that you will see no houses go on the market if this passes.
dinyce peters
9:44 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Debbie,
I am with you!! As far as I could see the majority clearly was, NO CINEMA! All this for $200,000. With the extra 2 police and 1 detective, well..... there goes that money. Not to mention $10,000. needed per student and how many will that be? Everyone knew we needed a much larger middle school, which we got and a much larger high school which only gets piece meal additions, (that's attractive) way back when my daughter was just going into high school. If Washington puts the screws to Massachusetts as it threatens to do, there will be more people out of work,.. again! Let's not forget, "Lilly White Lynnfield" and those of us who live in our "Ivory Towers" as some misled fool refers to us as, is not exempt to the national economy. This is not Hollywood, it is Lynnfield ,Ma. There were residents who lost their homes to forclosure. Some just could not afford to stay any longer. Some who now have upsidedown mortgages. Does Tye also think all of Lynnfield is Hollwood where there is money to burn!! This "high end" visionary conception is not the reality Tye wants it to be. And by the way... his cutsie pictures of the old cinemas were in cities, not towns. I used to go the Capitol, Regent and the Strand when I was a kid too.
Gerry MacDonald
8:43 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Sounds like Cinema has problems
John
9:04 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
This is the third attempt in six years by the developer to try and get a cinema complex to be part of MarketStreet. We were told at the outset that a theatre is NOT necessary for the success of the development, but rather it would be a nice addition to the "mix."
According to Mr. Tye at last night's BOS meeting, more than 90 percent of the retail space has already been leased. So, it appears ND is doing just fine attracting tenants WITHOUT a cinema already, so why the repeated attempts to put one in? And, yes, "things change," Selectman Nelson, but all we're asking is for ND and town officials to honor the original agreement -- no cinema -- it's really that simple. Is the projected extra $200K in meals tax revenue really worth ripping the town apart, creating more traffic, etc.?
Additionally, is anyone else wondering, as I am, what is happening with the 80,000 square feet of office space at MarketStreet that was supposed to be part of the complex to give it a "village" feel, with second floor space above the street-level retail to be occupied by doctors, lawyers, accountants, and other professionals? At last night's update, Mr.Tye mentioned that 10K of office space is coming online in Phase 1, but curiously did not make mention of when the remaining 70K will be completed. Is ND having trouble leasing this space? Is the 45K square footage for the proposed cinema replacing the office space or in addition to that space?
Joe DeMaina
9:50 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Is the 45K square footage for the proposed cinema replacing the office space or in addition to that space?" I believe replacing.
Peggy Lentini
9:43 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
John i can probably tell you where that 70k went....Its going to be part of the cinema. Did anyone else at the meeting catch what Mr. Tye said? Mr. Tye himself is an investor in this cinema project no wonder why he's fighting so hard to get this passed,he stands to make ALOT of money. I asked him specifically why 8 cinemas why not 4, his answer to me was they (Mr. Tye and the other investors) wouldnt make enough money.Hows that grab ya? well at least he was honest. In a few years he will leave Lynnfield and probably head south to some luxury development collecting huge returns to fund his retirement and we (the Lynnfield residents) will be left here dealing with the aftermath. By the way if you people who don't live near market street think this won't be a problem for you with the traffic let me be the one to burst your bubble. First , it just won't be walnut street with traffic problems think about the people coming from Peabody and Lynn they will be using salem street if 128 exit is backed up and The people coming from Reading and Middleton They will be using main and Lowell st. and Wakefield will be using Salem st. as well. What about the people getting off at the Main st. exit on 128 to avoid the backup on Walnut st. Ya just as I thought good luck with that people especially at Christmas time. Remember folks this cinema will hold over 1000 people with movies changing every 2 hours coming and going.
Frances Fleming
9:06 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
These upscale cinemas are fantastic. I think it would be very positive for the Town of Lynnfield. It would provide employment & income for us as well as interesting films. I think it is all the negativity that is dividing the town, not the movie theater.
Craig Foster
9:14 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The problem is the people that are most vocal about it are probably the ones that will be least affected by it or are the type of people that have the not in my town attitude and think the town would be better and more attractive without it.
But they are wrong, what will hurt the property value in this town are high tax rates. Anything that brings in additional revenue to the town should be looked at. It doesn't matter how good your schools are if your taxes are too high for people to live in the town.
dinyce peters
9:50 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Frances, at $8.00 an hour?????????? The negativity is because of the movie theatre!
Joe DeMaina
9:55 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Calling it a specialty theatre because it has a few premium seats is like calling an airplane a specialty airliner because it has a first class compartment.
Same movies,no additional income,minimum wage jobs, more traffic,more potential trouble from an additional 6,000 kids a week-end-----tell where the fantastic is again.
Joe DeMaina
9:58 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Craig-- I live on Alexandra Rd. And I have been to literally hundreds of meetings over the last 8 years. Just about every meeting ever had on this subject-so don't insult me.
linda
4:14 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The Mashpee Commons in Mashpee, on the Cape has a cinema with limited screens and the setting of the commons shopping is similar to what we will see here in Lynnfield. There has never been a problem with kids hanging out in or around the cinema or the Commons itself. Places for tween/teens to hangout in Mashpee are far more limited than here in town and still there are no problems with attracting the wrong element. Instead the cinema attracts families and seniors who would rather not travel to either Hyannis or Falmouth for movie entertainment, where kids do hang out. The kids we are all so worried about will continue to frequent the cinemas they currently go to. I see no threat to the way of life or the image of Lynnfield. Incidentally , Pinkberry will be more of a attraction for the younger set than the cinema.
Frances Fleming
9:06 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
These upscale cinemas are fantastic. I think it would be very positive for the Town of Lynnfield. It would provide employment & income for us as well as interesting films. I think it is all the negativity that is dividing the town, not the movie theater.
linda
11:06 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
One other thing regarding the additional expense for police at the Market Place...in Mashpee commons, the patrols are done by private security firms like Securitas and are paid for by the retailer groups and it works very well. No extra burden to the town's police budget.
Joe DeMaina
11:14 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Linda--The North Shore Mall has a police substation in the mall for all the obvious reasons. And police cost money.
Nicky
9:15 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Lynnfield was once a quiet little town. Now all the new residents, who thought the zip code would convey class and prestige, are destroying the quietness that made the town great. Lynnfield was never flashy. Now it's becoming an overpriced Saugus. Thanks a lot.
Don't be suckers, Tye couldn't care less about the town and it's residents.. How does the town benefit from a movie theater? This is ridiculous. Sure, "additional 200k" in revenues. You think that will save the town from another 2 1/2 override? How about endless gridlock and traffic accidents from all the low riders and idiots from all over bringing their baby mamas to the "upscale"movie theater. Good luck with that. I'll be moving to Middleton.
Craig Foster
9:24 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
This makes me want to vote for the Cinema even more. If it will get people with racist attitudes out of the town than it a great thing for the Town.
Peggy Lentini
10:06 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Yes Nicky, your right Mr Tye could'nt care less about Lynnfield. Last night at the meeting he told us that he was an investor with a few other people who weren't even from MA. So you can see its all about the MONEY for Mr.Tye. He wants this cinema its an investment for him people wake upppppp. I predict in a few short years Mr. Tye will leave Lynnfield and head south to some luxury development living quite well collecting his big fat check every month while where here dealing with 1000 people coming and going every 2 hours from the cinema not to mention the traffic from the restaurants and stores.Oh and I can't wait to see what the traffic is gonna be like at christmas time. By the way Walnut St. wont be the only traffic problem wait til people start taking the main st exit to bypass the backup at walnut. and what about Salem st with people coming from Lynn Saugus and Peabody? What about Lowell st and main st? oh I could go on and on. You people have no idea what your in for. You wont be able to get in or out of your own town. Good Luck
Pioneer
9:20 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I'm with Nicky. Craig, why don't you try to live here for more than 5 months before rendering such strong opinions.
Craig Foster
9:29 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
It doesn't matter how long I have or have not lived here. I allowed to have my own thoughts on what I want for the neighborhood I live in. It wrong to have racist attitudes and to think that the problems that will be caused by a Cinema.
And I'm betting you and probably Nicky and most of the Vocal people don't even live close to the site and really wouldn't have your lives affect by it one way or another.
Nicky
9:43 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Craig, Lynnfield is an expensive town. Not everyone can afford it. It's not worth destroying the character of the town for the additional revenue that will just go to hiring new police and fire to handle the extra volume of incidents. Furthermore, by allowing Lynnfield to become another Burlington or Reading etc, you are diminishing the value. Towns like Lynnfield are in short supply, and in high demand, hence the higher price level. That's reality.
I grew up in this town. My family has been in lynnfield for over 60 years. I want to raise my kids here, but I see what the town is becoming and I'm having serious second thoughts. That's right, not in my backyard! That's why people live in lynnfield, because they'd rather pay more to not have a mall in their backyard.
To address the "jobs" it will create. For who? Kids? No one is going to afford a mortgage in lynnfield on a movie theater wage. Stop buying into these false premises.
Make no mistake, it will create more opportunity for crime as well. It will attract drug dealers from all over because now they have a new and "upscale" meeting place. Ask the long term residents of Danvers how the malls worked out for them, and what type of element it brought into the town.
M
1:24 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
"Become another Reading?" 1st, Reading has twice population of Lynnfield, so of course we will have more retail - OK, we have admittedly generic Walker's Brook Drive, with Jordan's (which IS a nearby movie cinema, but not a multiplex --but, still, why does Lynnfield need theatre with this one nearby) and all the retail clustered right there, but I wouldn't go so far as to liken Reading with Burlington. Like most places, we have.our token cluster of 8 or 9 national chain stores, conveniently located in one plaza. Plus a coupla supermarkets across the street. That is mostly where it's at, though along Rt. 28 there is Home Goods and a few small retail spots like Doyons. Hardly the same as Burlington, which has two malls, and nearly a dozen different shopping centers that I can think off off top of my head.
2nd, Reading does a real "walkable" downtown, with a town common, plenty of non-chain restaurants & stores, etc..the "town common" feel that Market Street wants (except Market Street has much more parking). Yes, we have Walgreens, CVS, & Starbucks, as I suspect Market Street will, too, but Reading is not a town "known" for our retail like Burlington, are we?
M
1:29 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I do agree with you though, that Lynnfield has a special small town feel, but it seems that ship has sailed with the building of Market Street in the first place. Derby Street Shoppes have not diminished Hingham's prestige, but Derby Street is not near homes & doesn't have a multiplex. Sounds like Ted Tye will just keep coming back every 2 years to try to get zoning changed, until the place is too built out to fit a theatre. Good luck.
marc bowlen
9:56 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The Market Place is not big enough to have a cinema! The local government is using this to generate more income that they can steal in the form of tax revenue and create bigger government in the form of government jobs! The government is usurped , an authoritarian dictatorship that always goes against the will of the people!
dinyce peters
9:57 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
NICKY!!! AMEN!!!!!
dinyce peters
10:02 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Mr. Foster, I live on the Walnut Street end of Glen Meadow. The dust, dirt, noise, blasting, ect... does indeed affect and effect me!!! No window were poen in my house last spring, summer or fall!!! I am also on a hill where I can see what once was a lovely, woodsy, parcl of land. My only saving grace to this, is at least I still see the sunsets..
marc bowlen
10:04 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Nicky, the government wants more crime because it creates more jobs and overtime in the form of police, court, and attorneys. The Bar Association has taken over all forms of government, being elected illegally, they can not sit as lawmakers and practice law which they do! It violates the separation of powers act in the constitution! All these laws they pass benefit their practice of law and the same goes for selectmen, they approve measures that benefit the growth of their local government and not the people! They are there to rob, steal and cheat people out of their money. They use the police as a tool to generate money to benefit their industry of government. They must be stopped at all costs!
Nicky
10:05 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Really Craig? The whole town will be affected. And who said anything about race?
Craig Foster
10:19 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
You did - many people would consider this quote from your comment above racist.
"accidents from all the low riders and idiots from all over bringing their baby mamas to the "upscale"movie theater."
Nicky
10:16 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Please, everybody who wants to preserve the remaining integrity of the town, talk to your neighbors and make sure we all go to town meeting and put a stop to this!
Peggy Lentini
10:12 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
YES, I agree, Nicky is right talk to your neighbors and put a stop to this.
Jim
10:30 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Why are we still debating the merits of Market Street? It's happening. We should be working with ND to make it as successful as possible. If Ted thinks a high-end cinema is going to make the development more successful in the long term, we should listen to his reasoning and then rationally discuss/debate the merits as a town.
For what it's worth, I've lived in town since 1996 and don't expect Market Street to negatively impact what I've come to love about Lynnfield during my time here.
Craig Foster
10:54 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I'm with you Jim.
It's happening let's make it the best it can be.
John
11:07 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
To Jim & Craig,
Please don't misconstrue that those of us in opposition to the cinema are still debating the merits of the entire development. That shipped sailed a long time ago, we're onboard with it, and clearly, as taxpayers, we all have a vested interest in its overall success.
Instead, all we're trying to do is to get National Development to honor the original agreement they made with the town and its citizens that clearly said there would NOT be a cinema as part of the complex. Mr. Tye said back then that a cinema was NOT required for the development to be successful and, as I pointed out in an earlier post above, judging from the 90+ percent leasing rate they already have, he's correct.
So, the question to be asking is why does this cinema idea keep getting floated every few years?
Joe DeMaina
1:36 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
His current proposal is high end in name only. It's just a movie theatre.
dinyce peters
10:58 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Mr. DeMaina, Mr McKenzie and ALL those who stood up for the people of Lynnfield who do not want this blasted 8 screen, "screening room" (choke, choke) I wish to personally thank you. Although I do speaking engagements for MADD and other sectors regarding the deadly results of drunk driving, I am still very shy to speak in public. So, thank you all, for publicly addressing our concerns and attitudes. You made a wonderful presentation.
Linda
11:13 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Nicky I thought you and your bigoted ways were leaving for Middleton? Beware there are pet shops in your next town
Jim
11:16 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
@John - I appreciate your comment, but from what I heard last night you're in the minority when it comes to the folks opposing the cinema. Most of the speakers focused on the project in general vs. whether the cinema concept had merit. There was a lot of anger in the room that prevented many of us in favor of hearing more about the project from speaking. It was a very hostile environment.
Regarding your question, I can't answer for Mr. Tye. I will say that the concept he's trying to propose is relatively new and would be unique to Massachusetts, which makes it a drawing card for Market Street. I imagine their research shows it will increase the average $'s spent/visitor in a significant way (I have no knowledge if this is true, but it seems logical).
John
12:11 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I hear what you're saying, Jim, and can appreciate where you're coming from. And I do think that sometimes, as human beings, we all tend to let our emotions get the better of us and the real issue to be discussed gets clouded a bit as a result.
However, to be fair, if you've been contractually "promised" something up front (no cinema) before the first shovel of dirt has been turned over, then asked to reconsider it again (and ultimately get defeated via vote at Town Meeting), only to have it be raised yet again for a third time, you can see where folks might be frustrated/angry and wondering what's going on. Is a deal a deal, or not?
A healthy -- and mutually respectful -- public discourse about the perceived merits, or lack thereof, of the cinema is where we need to be.
dinyce peters
12:02 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Dear Lynnfield voters,
I am very concerned about what time "last-call" be here in Lynnfield, especially in Kings and just how diligent and strigent will the legal age limit entry be enforced for these patrons, especially with all the fake ID"s that are used. Walnut and Salem Streets are to be driven with extreme caution on a good day let alone at night, or in bad weather or icy streets or texting or those who are impaired! Too many families suffer the shattering effects of grief and the forever-changed family dynamics of a loved one, unnecessarily killed by a drunk driver. Many spouses suffer the breakdown of their marriage, and family separation. There is no closure to such a violent and unprepared death. There are no good-bye's, no I love you', no I'll see you later. There is no-thing. We are the family behind The Alexander Peters Memorial Fund and the annual P-MONEY ONE PITCH TOURNAMENT, fundraiser. Alcohol and certain settings do not mix and we must be diligent with the conditions of those who consume alcohol within the Market Place drinking establishments.
dinyce peters
12:20 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
No parent should bury their child! No sister or brother should live the rest of their lives with the very real, unwanted, yet forced upon, devastating secondary losses. The people responsible for the crash also live with the knowledge that they destroyed a life and a family. Friends and relatives are also forever changed. I am not opposed to alcohol, however, Lynnfield is our home and many of you are our friends and neighbors. Those of you who know us, know first hand, how the death of our son and brother changed our family. Unfortunately, there are 13 families that I am aware of, in this little town who have buried their children due to such circumstances. It appears Mr. Tye is so enslaved to the money-god, there is no room for the consequential realities that his visionary greed will produce. Heaven, help us.
dinyce peters
12:32 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I ask you, how many bars are needed in Lynnfield. Every restaurant and entertainment establishment thus far in Market Place has been granted a liquor license. All in such a small square footage area.!! Really?????? Maybe we should rename this to "Washington Street Lynnfield"
Frank
12:37 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Specialty cinema = Grey Poupon instead of yellow mustard on your hot dog....
marc bowlen
12:41 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The pigs in government need to realize they are not running a business, they are running a country! The purpose of government is not to keep raising revenue and creating government but to maintain roads, defense, schools and leave people alone and let them live their lives freely. The idea that they approve a development like this to generate tax revenue is criminal behavior. And Nick is not racist. He pays to live in Lynnfield because he doesnt want to live with the garbage in Lawrence, Lowell and Chelsea. Also the politicians have stolen your tax money from towns like Lynnfield, Saugus, Andover, North Andover that you pay in state income tax and built new schools for the welfare kids in Lawrence, Lowell and Chelsea while the higher income level towns have older schools in disrepair! Those welfare cities I mentioned happen to vote for the Democrats that have stolen your money! They have taken over this country through sedition and treason and they need to be held accountable!
Linda
7:56 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
WOW! Mark you have some serious issues, obviously brought up with a silver spoon in your mouth. Put your big boy pants on & try volunteering in a soup kitchen in one of the towns you accuse of being garbage. When it's all over Mark it's not about where you live, what you drive, or your social status; it's about how you treat others.
marc bowlen
1:02 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
this clown got elected president by ghetto welfare crack heads turning out in mass to see one of their own kind get elected to power! Since then he passed an illegal tax in the form of healthcare mandates robbing me of my hard earned money to pay for his ghetto voters crack head babies with no daddy's then the price of gas has averaged $3.80 under Obama , it was $1.80 on election night 2008, averaged $2.60 under G.W. Bush. then this piece of garbage president hired 25,000 IRS workers in 2009 to harass self employed business owners in schemes to create revenue by stealing from hard working people to pay for his social programs, The IRS stole money from me for failing to pay for nazi healthcare mandates to support ghetto baby's, now this puke in the white house wants to grant amnesty to 11 million illegals so his democratic party can get more votes, thus wiping out this country! now this scumbag wants us to pay more taxes to pay for lazy federal employees to keep their GOVERNMENT JOBS , instead of them working in the private sector, I don't want to end up living in gutter slums like Lynn, Lowell, Lawrence, Chelsea. The Democratic party is responsible for the demise of this country! They promote dependency on big brother, rape it's hard working citizens and believe that the only people that should make a 6 figure income is a government worker!
MWC
1:07 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I'm a 6 year resident with two young, pre-school aged children and am trying to be an observer of all the opinions on the theater and the MS project so I can cast an educated vote.
I come from a town in NY that had a development boom some 10 years prior - Port Chester. What I can say from my observations is no amount of tax revenue generated from that similar project off set taxes on home owners. The money goes to the police, fire department & public works. $200K from a movie theater...I just read our highest paid cop makes ~$180 with OT/Details. I'm pretty sure with a theater we'll need a cop at MS full time. So that 'carrot' is really a wash.
That said, back to having a family of 4; a movie outing today cost $60+. What's an upscale visit going to cost me. With today's digital streaming - we buy the movie $15 on Amazon. Maybe I'm naive but isn't going to the movies a dying pastime?
I think Dinyce has some great points about liquor licenses and traffic/DWI. If you are going to MS from North Reading or Middleton you're going to drive via Main/Summer/Walnut.
I think the town has a responsibility to pressure the benefactors of these licenses to partner with a livery service so patrons can get a taxi home if needed. Tye/ND we need Lynnfield Taxi as a tenant IMO.
dinyce peters
1:37 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
MWC, Thank you!!! Please check out; asafewayhome.com This can be downloaded to your phone for free and gives you or the kids, for whom it was created, the names and numbers for a confidential ride home including a taxi service that participates in the program.
MWC
1:45 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Thanks Dinyce. Though it's not on iPhone its a good option for some. http://www.asafewayhome.com/images/safewayhome.pdf
I do still think if someone stumbles out of Yard House and there's a cab stand they'd think twice before driving and hop in the cab.
marc bowlen
1:43 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Hey MWC! We don't need anymore police, fire, and DPW hacks, we need to keep our money and live in peace and quiet, those occupations you mentioned are propaganda thrown at us by userped government officials! Those are people who can't make it in the private sector and are civil service hacks with poor attitudes.
MWC
1:55 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I hear ya Marc and I agree with your philosophy but it's too late. This project is ON and we're going to have more demands placed on our resources.
Nameless Conservative
1:44 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The warrant, if/whenever it is submitted, should be tabled until ND can produce a letter of intent by a prospective cinema tenant who additionally states their full agreement to adopt the plan that Mr. Tye presented last night including any wish list modifications they might seek appropriate to their specific business plan.
Otherwise, I envision more back biting and weasel tactics in the future. Should the unlikely occur and this passes at Town Meeting, a newfound prospective tenant, schmoozed by ND, might 'ask' (extort us) for yet even more ‘changes’.
No matter, I'm voting no because I simply do not believe an 'upscale' cinema will draw many customers and someday we’ll end up deciding whether to say goodbye to a bankrupt tenant or permit them to show skin flicks.
People who have money, (and even many who do not...), already have high-def in-home theater quality TV's complete with surround sound and leather recliners. With a "free" drink in hand and a cigar in their mouth they can order up just about any movie via the net, FIOS or Comcast – anytime they wish – then pause it to go baste the pig roasting out back. (Those naughty gluttons!)
So… why would anyone with the above want to bother to come to this megaplex to pay $11 (or whatever?) for less than what they have at home? I doubt that I would and I only have a 30” 720P TV (…Cont’d)
Nameless Conservative
1:45 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
(Cont’d …)
IMO cinema is dying a slow death and its days are numbered. 50 years ago it was the ONLY place you could see a movie in color and, further back before TV, it was the ONLY place you could go to see news presented with moving images, (especially popular in WW2 for folks to drop in to see on their way home from their job at the bomb factory http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=792R4AdxNLI )
Nobody back then would have dreamt of seeing say "The Wizard of Oz" anytime they wished, displayed in as good or better a format than what was available back then…. at home.
If ya’ll want to get serious about attracting crowds of people buying tickets to see something ‘upscale’, how about REAL THEATER? Live on stage performance has had its ups and downs but it’s a heck of lot older than cinema and I think it is on an upswing right now. Perhaps people get tired of watching so many movies at home they need a break once in a while? I don’t really know but that’s my suggestion for someone else to research. I believe Stoneham Theater and North Shore Music Theater are doing very well these days, no?
M
1:58 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
You make great points, Mike. The kind of movies that do make money seem to attract teen boys (i.e., action flicks & similar "blockbusters"), probably not the demographic that Lynnfield wants hanging around Market Street. There is supposedly a grown in unique experiences like Imax 3D movies...which is just own town over, of course.
This is a good industry article explaining why lifestyle centers & outdoor malls love luring multiplex cinemas:
http://www.natoonline.org/infocus/05april/mall.htm
As others here have noted, it's to draw customers to other stores. Ted Tye can get more tenants with that lure. As article states:
"“Anchors are typically given some kind of subsidy,” confirms Thompson. The developer who grants it, Thompson says, “knows if he has a theatre he’ll get five restaurants and three other retailers that otherwise wouldn’t have considered the site. He looks at an overall blend of return and says, ‘OK, this is what I get with the theatre, and overall it’s better with the theatre even if I subsidize it.’ "
MWC
1:58 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I agree Mike. I'd rather a stage theater and I think it would offer a viable mixed use for the town.
dinyce peters
7:21 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Mike Mitchell,,
Great sense of humor. And a standing BRAVO to you!!!! :)
Nameless Conservative
11:01 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Thanks Dinyce and, in case no one noticed, I even tried to adhere to original topic continuity in my selection of that particular youtube WW2 news reel of 9th AAF activity... they were bombing Cannes. ( I couldn't pass up the multiple levels of irony... hence the quip of people who worked at a bomb factory going to a cinema to see bombs having to be dropped on the premier city for celebrating ... cinema. )
John
3:04 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Thanks for the link, M, (http://www.natoonline.org/infocus/05april/mall.htm) to that article.
The following excerpt from that very informative story is particularly illuminating (the items in ALL CAPS are mine for emphasis):
The trick, experts agree, is to find a retail site in an area UNDERSERVED by existing cinemas. “Forcing a theatre into a geographic area WHICH IS ALREADY ADEQUATELY SCREENED, even when a developer is willing to build turnkey for the exhibitor, only exacerbates the problem of SCREEN SATURATION and REVENUE DILUTION,” explains Regal Entertainment Group exec John Roper.
Let's see, there are five movie complexes -- comprising 75 screens -- within a short drive of MarketStreet: Woburn (16 screens; 9 miles away), Burlington (10 screens; 13 miles), Revere (20 screens; 8 miles), Danvers (20 screens at Liberty Tree Mall plus another 9 at Hollywood Hits across Route 128; 8 miles).
Now, I'm no expert, but it certainly sounds to me like this region is most definitely not "underserved" at all and more than "adequately screened" with the current inventory already in place.
M
3:17 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Make that 77 screens - Although not a multiplex, don't forget the Jordan's Imax theatre in Reading, which is only 3 miles away (although not a multiplex, it does provide a unique 3D screen). There is also the Beverly Cabot Cinemas that are 13 miles away, and are indeed a unique, specialty theatre complex.
M
3:28 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Umm, now make that 81 screens, Cinema Salem (in Salem MA, 10 miles away) has 4 screens and describes itself as not just an independent community theatre but " a café, an art gallery, an art house, a live music venue, and a home to one of America’s largest all-documentary film festivals". It also shows major movies like Django & Zero Dark Thirty (at present). This kind of "unique", smaller theatre is probably what folks in Lynnfield would prefer.
With 8 screens, avg 200 seats/screen (20 rows x 10 seats/row in smallest ones) that's parking for about 600-800 cars (assuming 2/car at least) that needs to be dedicated just to the movie theatre, right? Sounds like you'd need a garage, too.
John
3:34 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Building on my previous post, below are some other excerpts from that same article (again, items in caps are mine for emphasis). More traffic, anyone?
A 1998 study of cross-shopping traffic in retail centers with cinemas, commissioned by the International Association of Shopping Centers (ICSC), determined that one in five movie patrons (20 percent) had visited the center exclusively for the purpose of seeing a movie, MAKING NO OTHER TRIPS FOR SHOPPING.
“This indicates,” concluded the report, “that theatres drew in potential shoppers who otherwise wouldn’t have been exposed to the center.”
“We are seeing a trend of more theatres serving as ANCHORS of retail centers . . .
“Cinemas are a great activity anchor, a great people generator, a great reason for coming, so we love them,” says Wong.
. . . according to the ICSC statistics, lifestyle centers (Poster's Note: MarketStreet) incorporate space for cinemas more often than traditional malls. Cinemas make up a collective 5 percent of mall tenant space, compared to a collective 8.4 percent of all lifestyle center tenant space. (Poster's Note: At 45K square feet, the proposed cinemax complex at MarketStreet would represent an above average more than 11 percent of all of the center's 395K retail space.)
"Movie theatres are a TRAFFIC GENERATOR for the lifestyle center because of how it creates a new community, this new ‘urbanism,’ so to speak.”
Nameless Conservative
6:54 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I plotted out data I found for movie ticket sales per capita (per capita per year I realize now I forgot to include..)- http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y48/mikeishere/Movie-Sales-Per-Capita.gif
The recent declining trend of late could just be the economy but is likely affected by DTTV (first broadcast in 1998) as well as an accelerating number of large high def. TV's
The chart isn't scary but then ... it can't be described as 'encouraging' either IMO.
Nameless Conservative
9:58 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Updated for clarity- http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y48/mikeishere/Movie-Sales-Per-Capita2.gif
(Sorry, incompetence at Photo Bucket precludes being able to simply update/overwrite a given image file so the original had to be 404'd.)
Karen R.
7:37 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
After reading these posts, I fear that one of the very important points of town division, that was brought up by the Selectman and other residents, is coming true. Neighbors speaking out against one another, speaking for one another, degrading other viewpoints is not a fruitful solution, nor does it add anything to the very legitimate debate we have before us. Let's try to be civil, and listen with an honest attempt to understand what our neighbors are thinking and feeling. An on-line post may seem anonymous, but we all live closer than we think.
Jack Conley
8:34 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Some have mentioned a theater. I believe a dinner theater would be much preferred and a better fit. I also feel they're are more than enough cinema's in the area. Market St would have greater character with a live theater than cinema's.
Wallace McKenzie
10:22 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
A multiplex is a multiplex. You can't zone a dinner theater. When it was proposed in 2008 it was for 360 seats and 38,000 sq ft. It is now at 800-1000 seats and 45,000 seats
Nicky
10:12 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Craig, I understand your response. You cannot not argue any of the points I made, so you resort to the "racist" attack. I never once mentioned race. You assigned a racial connotation to "low riders and baby mamas". Those terms can be, and are, used for any skin color. You need to think about why you immediately make that connection.
Maybe you should take a ride to some local malls, you'll see that baby mamas come in all colors. Low riders are usually driven by younger, inexperienced drivers, and usually without paying much attention to the road.
I'll rephrase, it will attract more young punks and troublemakers from all over to cause trouble in Lynnfield. Capiche?
Go check out the upscale movie theater in revere on a Friday night- yes the call it a "premium theater" - and see what I mean.
M
10:35 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
From articles I've read, lifestyle center restaurants like movie theatres because they drive traffic to restaurants & vice versa. It's all about bringing traffic/customers to the mall. Seems like, regardless of what the people look like who comprise the increased traffic, or what they drive, or how much they make, or where they're from, how old they are, etc., the bottom line is that there will be a lot more people and cars, many hundreds more, going into Market Street... and that is something the existing traffic & parking plans did not take into account. Can you all at least agree that lots more cars in and out of the site, at very late hours, will be bad for Lynnfield, even if the cars are all BMWs and Mercedes driven by quiet, well-to-do older upscale kinds of folks? Yes, there may be other kinds of vehicles and people, who have ages/races/incomes/lifestyles that will not be desired by some, but the bottom line really seems to be the increased traffic, congestion and late night noise (from autos & patrons) that a multiplex cinema cannot help but bring.
John
11:52 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Spot on, M.
ND and Mr. Tye: Honor the original deal and promise you made to us in 2006-07 -- no cinemas!
Concerned Lynnfield citizens: Attend Town Meeting and vote this irreversible addition to the MarketStreet complex and negative impact to the entire town down . . . for a SECOND time.
Craig Foster
2:14 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
John, I will be there and I plan on voting YES.
but for the second time it will probably get a majority YES vote but not pass because it will need 2/3rds of the vote to pass.
You do know that the last time this came up a majority of the town voted in favor of it.
Nameless Conservative
9:05 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
Your divisive mention of 'majority' rings hollow when one considers that not only did every Amendment to the US Constitution require a 2/3 vote in Congress they bore the additional burden of requiring ratification by 2/3 of these United States.
... and even a bar set THAT high didn't preclude making a mistake - the 18th Amendment.
dinyce peters
12:00 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
Well no surprise there,l Mr. Foster
Sydney
8:38 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
Hey -
WIth 180 housing units also going in along with the LIFE senior housing, has anyone (and we all know that our town officials have not) given thought to the bus routes and traffic associated with kids coming and going to school and the taffic within that complex? What about kids getting home with Move Matinees letting out??
ALSO, I suspect that some of those housing units will be within a mile of Huckleberry hill school as the crow flys. Will they walk?? It is already unsafe for kids on Walnut to walk and yet the school system indeed makes 1st, 2nd and 3rd graders (along with 4th graders) to do so
dinyce peters
12:00 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
An excellent point, Sydney.
Karen R.
1:51 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
Those kids would not be walking to Huckleberry, the town will be required to provide busing, but these are very valid concerns about the "neighborhood" they will be growing up in.
Sydney
3:38 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
Karen - I do hope you are right about the kids not needing to walk. There are a few "easements" for that development that are on Walnut and if a path is put in, I', not sure that they would not have to walk. Many kids take a step path behind Huckleberry to get there every day so, it's not just "road" distance that the school system uses to deterime who walks.
While I am typing I will add that the sidewalks for these young kids were not cleared at the time they needed to walk to school during the last big storm and the sidewalks in the neighborhoods that they do walk thru are not cleared even now ..
Craig Foster
5:03 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
The Apartments are not going to have impact the schools as much as you think being that they are higher end luxury apartments I think you would end up with more Couples without kids than ones with kids moving in. I would be surprised if you got more then additional 50 kids coming into the school system from the apartments.
Sydney
3:40 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
I'll add that Huckleberry will be over capacity when those units go in ... based upon the impact we saw from the appartments behind the car dealer on Rt 1
Jim
3:42 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
Maybe the additional $200k/year we receive from the proposed cinema could be allocated to solve the kids/sidewalks problem?
Karen R.
4:08 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
I live much closer to Huckleberry and my kids take the bus, so I know for sure they will not be walking even if it were safe to do so. Nevertheless, it's not safe for ANYBODY to be walking along Walnut St. and certainly not at night, and with increased traffic coming from the mall and the various bars that this new mall brings. Thank you Dinyce for calling attention to the very serious issue of drunk driving; something I hadn't even considered in this entire fiasco.
Karen R.
4:09 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
And I thought the 200 K was going for increased police detail. Doesn't sound like we have enough 200 K s to go around.
Karen R.
4:11 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
People keep saying how wonderful it will be to walk to the new restaurants; it would be a short stroll for me, walking is one of my favorite activities, but I won't be doing it, and I'll be curious to observe how many actually do.
Wallace McKenzie
8:55 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013
National Development delaying presenting an article on the cinema. Details at www.topics01940.org